Articles tagged as Hobby Lobby
-
Does Gordon Giampietro Need a Defense?- Prof. Hadley Arkes in The Catholic Thing
Writing in The Catholic Thing, Professor Hadley Arkes defends Gordon Giampietro, a nominee for a federal district judgeship in Wisconsin in a piece titled “Does Gordon Giampietro Need a Defense?” A “controversy” was generated because of a supportive comment that Mr. Giampietro posted on a column written by Professor Arkes in The Catholic Thing four […] -
“The Paths of Resistance”—Prof. Hadley Arkes in The Catholic Thing
Writing in The Catholic Thing, Professor Hadley Arkes, in “The Paths of Resistance,” offers two possible (legislative) steps that can be taken in light of the Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. Some excerpts: “In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage, two lines of response may be open to those who […] -
“Response to Prof. Robert Miller—Again”—Prof. Hadley Arkes
Prof. Arkes responds to a spirited exchange of essays he shared with Prof. Robert Miller August 2014 in the Public Discourse on the grounds and scope of religious liberty in the aftermath of the Hobby Lobby case -
“Post-Hobby Lobby Illusions”– Prof. Hadley Arkes in Library of Law and Liberty
Writing in the Library of Law and Liberty, Prof. Hadley Arkes revisits the Hobby Lobby case, whose jurisprudence has given rise to “Post-Hobby Lobby Illusions.” These “illusions” are stories that our friends are willing to tell themselves as they seek to elevate into a reigning doctrine groundless slogans that have recruited their sentiments. Some excerpts: “My own […] -
“Backing Happily into Heresies?”–Prof. Hadley Arkes in The Catholic Thing
Writing in The Catholic Thing, Prof. Hadley Arkes warns that as we seek our ends, we should not install premises that strike at the moral ground of our own position. -
“The New Jurisprudence of ‘Beliefspeak’” –Prof. Arkes in Library of Law and Liberty
Writing for the Library of Law and Liberty, Prof. Hadley Arkes cautions us not to be “bedazzled” by the outcome of Hobby Lobby. Instead, he cautions us to remain wary of how the decision’s underlying logic undercuts principled arguments for religious freedom. Some excerpts: “If I had been a member of the Court in the Hobby Lobby […] -
“Recasting Religious Freedom” –Hadley Arkes in First Things
In the June/July 2014 issue of First Things, Prof. Hadley Arkes examines the grounds on which we can determine what is a religion in light of cases before the Supreme Court in a piece titled, "Recasting Religious Liberty." -
“Hobby Lobby at the Court, Today” —Prof. Hadley Arkes in The Catholic Thing
Writing in The Catholic Thing, Prof. Hadley Arkes reflects on the cases of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood as tests of religious liberty when it takes the corporate form. Some excerpts: “If nothing else, a business that closes on the Sabbath or offers kosher food would reveal that character. It may be an ebbing of […] -
“Religion, the Corporate Life, and the Court” —Prof. Hadley Arkes in The Catholic Thing
Writing in The Catholic Thing, Prof. Hadley Arkes discusses Obamacare's contraception mandate in light of the Supreme Court cases of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood